I reckon that in this photo you can see many things. Both exhilarating and you can think what our nature presents. Also the method of doing this photo is amazing. I think that double exposure is interesting method to make your photos just amazing! Congratulation Malgorzata Walkowska! I am beginner, just 15 years old but the method will appear in my photos. :)
Your photo is both quieting and disturbing. Excellent. And I understand double exposure while some commenters obviously do not. Great job!. Makes me want to try with some of my photos.
Congrats Malgorzata!, You are a double exposure technique master! Superb job! Love your gallery and your photography vision.
Dear Friends! Thank you very much for all your comments and plusses. PLEASE see the link below. This information should help you understand better my photograph that was taken in double exposure technique. NOTHING WAS PHOTOSHOPED. The landscape was created by combining (IN THE CAMERA) two shots in one. Please also visit my profile on Your Shot (just click on my name above)where you will have a chance to see some more of my double exposure shots, including Daily Dozens from 2008 & 2014. National Geographic has the best photographers and experts in the world - they would not accept manipulated photograph.
Gratuluję wyróżnienia! To zdjęcie zasługuje...:))) Dużo się tu napracowano chyba przy składaniu kilku zdjęć(ale mogę się mylić,za co przepraszam z góry),ale efekt zaskakujący.Pozdrawiam
Shocking that my untrained eye knew within seconds that something was wrong with this photo; the reflection doesn't fit. Thanks to Dave Milliken's comment below I saw that the front row of trees was just enlarged and put into the background, just check out how they match, branch for branch. Having a photoshopped POD makes me wonder what Your Shot's editors were thinking.
I'm not an artist or photographer but I am disappointed that this was photoshopped. I can see it with my untrained eye. :/ I want to see nature NATURALLY. (With a camera, of course. Heehee)
One of the most obvious Photoshopped photos I've seen. I can see why it was done, to create a nice arc in the pond. But so obvious. You guys should have caught this.
I would have preferred it without the photoshopping. The hazier backline of trees is a larger copy of the frontline. You can tell if you take a close look at the branch patterns. This is the first time I've seen a photoshopped picture on NG!
@Craig Leigh Many thanks Craig. You should try with some with you photos. Lots of fun………. and very hard work! Best regards:))
@Kris Walkowski Thank you bro for your king words and support!
@Malgorzata Walkowska Thank you for sharing your beautiful photo and describing the technique to educate !!!!
@Malgorzata Walkowska Yes thanks for the explanation. You can understand how we could jump to the conclusion of photoshopping without the explanation being provided with the photo.
@Malgorzata Walkowska yeah - I was one of the haters too and my apologize for that. Maybe some clarification in advance could have been helpful too though ;) maybe next time.
@Malgorzata Walkowska Thank you for the explanation!
@Srimanta Ray MANY thanks dear Sri for your wonderful words. I have received your support for many, many months now and I can't thank you enough for that! Best regards form Poland!
@Kris Walkowski @Sebastian Wahlhuetter alright! agree - I shouldn't have written my comment in this way. it just looked to photoshopped and it wouldn't be the first time that this occurred. Some clarification in the text about the method would have been also helpful. but yeah - over all I take the blame. I was just a bit upset.
Subscribe to National Geographic magazine and save. Print and digital editions available for as little as $12.